Tuesday 26 March 2019

Abuse ring at a 'hell on earth' young offenders' institution:

Abuse ring at a 'hell on earth' young offenders' institution: Five prison officers are found guilty of physically abusing boys in the 70s and 80s after 1,600 complaints from former inmates

  • Young inmates at Medomsley Detention Centre were punched, kicked and raped
  • Durham Police launched probe into abuse between 1960 and closure in 1988  
  • Christopher Onslow, 72, John McGee, 74, Brian Greenwell, 70 all convicted today
  • Alan Bramley, 70, and Kevin Blakely, 67, were also found guilty in Teesside Court 
  • David McClure, 63, and Neil Sowerby, 62, were cleared of sex abuse and assault 

Five prison officers have been convicted of physically abusing boys at a youth detention centre more than 40 years ago following one of the biggest police probes in British history. 

Young inmates at Medomsley Detention Centre near Consett, County Durham were kicked, punched and stamped on, Teesside Crown Court heard. 

Others were stripped naked and made to bunny hop to the showers at the youth detention centre for under 21s between 1960 and its closure in 1988.

One victim described the institution as 'hell on earth.'

After a series of trials it can now be reported that five former members of staff, all in their 60s and 70s, have been convicted of misconduct in public office for crimes committed up to four decades ago.

Durham Police launched an investigation called Operation Seabrook in 2013 and spoke to 1,676 former inmates who claimed to have been abused at the centre. 

The prolific abuse has chilling echoes of the 1996 film sleepers starring Brad Pitt, Robert De Niro and Kevin Bacon, which sees young boys abused and raped by prison guards at a youth detention centre in New York. 

Former officer Christopher Onslow, 72 (pictured outside Teesside Crown Court) was convicted of misconduct in public office between 1975 and December 1980, a separate charge of misconduct in public office covering a later period from January 1981 to December 1985, inflicting grievous bodily harm to the boy on the cargo net, three charges of assault causing actual bodily harm, wounding with intent

 Christopher Onslow, 72,

John McGee, 74 (pictured outside Teesside Crown Court) was convicted of misconduct in a public office and assault causing actual bodily harm 

























John McGee, 74

were among five former prison officers at Medomsley Detention Centre in County Durham to be convicted of physical abuse of young inmates 

In the final trial today Alan Bramley, 70 (pictured outside Teesside Crown Court) was today convicted of misconduct in public office but cleared of assault causing actual bodily harm


In the final trial today Alan Bramley, 70 (pictured outside Teesside Crown Court) was today convicted of misconduct in public office but cleared of assault causing actual bodily harm

One young prisoner was beaten up by the officer in charge of physical training when he tried to tell him that one of his colleagues - later jailed for sexual abuse - had raped him in the kitchens.

The same officer threw rocks at a different prisoner causing him to fall in the gym and damage his vertebrae. 

Successive juries were told how a favoured device of some who worked at the centre was to ask new entries their name, and then punch or kick them when they failed to add 'Sir' in their responses. 

Judge Howard Crownson lifted reporting restrictions on the hearings after the verdicts were returned in the last of three trials today. 

Brian Greenwell, 70, was convicted of misconduct in public office 
Brian Greenwell, 70,
Kevin Blakely, 67, nicknamed Broken Nose by inmates and who worked at Medomsley between 1974 and 1983, was convicted of misconduct in a public office by assaulting and abusing detainees, but cleared of causing actual bodily harm and unlawful wounding 



















  


Kevin Blakely, 67, 

were both convicted of misconduct in public office for when they worked at the County Durham detention centre 

Describing the extent of the ill-treatment that some of the young men experienced, prosecutor Jamie Hill QC said: 'There was an atmosphere of fear and violence throughout the institution, and, we say, that atmosphere allowed officers such as these defendants to commit offences in the knowledge that that type of behaviour was sanctioned by their colleagues.

'To simply say that it was a different time with different attitudes would be to abdicate responsibility for investigating serious allegations of crime against people made vulnerable due to their incarceration.'

The seven defendants were split up into three separate trials, with five convicted and two cleared.

Former officer Christopher Onslow, 72, was convicted of misconduct in public office between 1975 and December 1980, a separate charge of misconduct in public office covering a later period from January 1981 to December 1985, inflicting grievous bodily harm, three charges of assault causing actual bodily harm and wounding with intent.

John McGee, 74, was convicted of misconduct in public office and assault causing actual bodily harm.

Brian Greenwell, 70, was convicted of misconduct in public office and Neil Sowerby, 62, was cleared of misconduct in public office, sexual charges and assault.

In the final trials today Kevin Blakely, 67, and Alan Bramley, 70, were both convicted of misconduct in public office but cleared of assaults causing actual bodily harm.
David McClure, 63, was cleared of assault and misconduct.

The jury heard how Onslow was in charge of physical training at the facility between 1975 and 1985, but 'exploited his position of authority in a consistently sadistic and brutal fashion'.

One of his victims was climbing an obstacle course, but got stuck while around 20ft in the air, prompting the then-officer, nicknamed 'The Machine' to throw rocks at him until he fell backwards onto the ground.

It was later discovered that the trainee had suffered three crushed vertebrae.

Onslow beat up an inmate who had been sent to work in the kitchens and was raped by Neville Husband - later convicted of sexually abusing inmates.

When the inmate said 'There's something amiss with Mr Husband in the kitchens', Onslow launched an attack and told him never to tell anyone else.

Another young offender was aged 17 when the defendant 'lost control of himself' and kicked and stamped on him, before throwing medicine balls at him.

He beat up an inmate who lost a 200m race during sports day, saying he had lost a £10 bet on the 17-year-old.

Another inmate, who was mixed race, was subjected to a torrent of racist abuse from Onslow and other wardens. 

Mr Hill said of Onslow: 'He took advantage of the power that had been entrusted to him and abused it to an alarming degree.' 

Ex-officer McGee punched one victim who was serving a three-month sentence in the face, before forcing him to remove his underwear and 'bunny-hop' to the showers after he had soiled himself. 

Kevin Blakely, 67, nicknamed Broken Nose by inmates, worked at Medomsley between 1974 and 1983 and was convicted of misconduct in a public office by assaulting and abusing detainees, but cleared of causing actual bodily harm and unlawful wounding.

Alan Bramley, 70, worked at the centre for four years from 1973 and was dubbed Bong Eye. He was convicted of misconduct in a public office by assaulting and abusing prisoners, but cleared of causing actual bodily harm and unlawful wounding.
Durham Police said that Onslow and McGee have launched appeals against their convictions. 
The five men are due to be sentenced at a later date.
Judge Crowson told Bramley and Blakely - the final two to be convicted - they could be released on bail.

He said: 'I do not have any doubts about you returning, you must understand when you return, there are possibilities including prison. 

'I will have to decide whether that is the appropriate sentence on the next occasion.'

Where was Medomsley Detention Centre and what was it used for?


In a terrible irony, Medomsley Detention Centre was set up to keep young offenders out of prison and away from the influence of older criminals.

For these teenagers were subjected to routine violence and mistreatment at the hands of the grown men who were supposed to look after them and maintain order.

Built on the site of a Victorian orphanage near Consett in 1960, it was designed to house young offenders aged 17 to 21 to serve sentences for offences which today would not routinely attract a custodial sentence.

It could hold 130 inmates but typically housed around 70, mainly for northern England.
They would normally spend six to eight weeks at the Home Office-run centre before being released. It closed in 1988.

Neville Husband, former boss of the Medomsley kitchens, was jailed in 2005 for 10 years for a series of sex attacks on young inmates.
Medomsley Detention Centre (pictured in 1999) was set up to keep young offenders out of prison and away from the influence of older criminals
Medomsley Detention Centre (pictured in 1999) was set up to keep young offenders out of prison and away from the influence of older criminals
After working at the centre he went on to become a church minister and has since died.

Jamie Hill QC, prosecuting, explained to the three juries how detention centres like Medomsley were designed to house detainees convicted of more minor offences, while those who had committed more serious offences would be sent to borstal training.

He said that the central goal at borstal was the rehabilitation of the young people sent there, adding that detention centres, in contrast, were 'a very different type of institution'.

Outlining the 'quasi-military' routines that existed there, he said that the young offenders would be made to follow strict timetables, with an emphasis on obedience to staff.

Mr Hill said that centres like Medomsley operated on a 'short sharp shock' mantra, but added that corporal punishment was only allowed when necessary, such as in self-defence or to restrain a detainee.

The centre was the scene of widespread abuse of young inmates between 1960 and its closure in 1988. It is pictured derelict in 1996

The centre was the scene of widespread abuse of young inmates between 1960 and its closure in 1988. It is pictured derelict in 1996

What was Operation Seabrook?  


Operation Seabrook was one of the country's biggest inquiries into decades-old sexual and physical abuse.

No fewer than 1,676 former detainees told detectives they were assaulted by staff over a period spanning the 1960s to when Medomsley Detention Centre closed in 1988.

Durham Police launched Operation Seabrook in August 2013 to ensure victims were receiving support, to investigate how it operated and to gather evidence with a view to prosecuting former staff members.

The force's Major Crime Team took the job on, and at times 70 detectives were working on the case.
It has identified 32 suspects who were still alive and in November 2017 the Crown Prosecution Service advised that seven should be charged.

Following a series of three trials, five officers have now been convicted of misconduct relating to physical abuse which went on there.

Durham Police said another six suspects could yet be charged.

In the course of the trials, during which reporting was banned, 71 complainants gave evidence. Five of the detainees who had died since coming forward had their statements read out in court.

Durham Police said it had collated 23,280 documents relating to the investigation.

Detective Chief Superintendent Adrian Green, the senior investigating officer, said that the force has deployed 'significant resource' when investigating the abuse claims
He said: 'I don't think there's been a historic abuse case with this number of complainants, in my knowledge, before.'

On the possibility of further charges being put, and further trials being held, he said: 'There may well be other people who have suffered in Medomsley who want to come forward, who identify other people for which evidence could be found.

'There are definitely other offenders who have been identified by victims who, if the evidence was available, certainly have questions to answer.'

Mr Green also explained how it is important to stress that there was not a 'regime of abuse' from officials, saying that those who have been convicted had 'abused their position'.

When asked whether the delay between the offences and the convictions was the result of a 'cover-up', he said of individuals that worked at the centre: 'If they knew that abuse of this nature was occurring then shame on them, because they should have intervened and they should have stopped it.

'They had a duty to do so, and have failed.'